Search Results for "impleading application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "impleading application"

528 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 528 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment Application in Partition Suit Under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Petitioners, claiming to be daughters-in-law and sons of the original defendant, have a direct interest in the suit property and are necessary parties for effective adjudication.

2 Jul 2026

The petitioners, Madhuri Pandurang Chavan, Kishori Nivas Gaikwad, Jayprakash Ananda Paymal, and Vaibhav Ananda Paymal, filed a writ petition under Art...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment Application in Partition Suit Under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Petitioners Claiming to be Coparceners Held Necessary Parties for Effective Adjudication.

2 Jul 2026

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Panhala, Kolhapur, rejecting their application under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment in Partition Suit Under Order I Rule 10 CPC — Petitioners Claiming Independent Title Are Necessary Parties. Trial Court's Rejection Set Aside to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Enable Complete Adjudication.

2 Jul 2026

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Panhala, Kolhapur, rejecting their application under ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

29 Jun 2026

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Implead Third Party in Arbitration — Section 37(2)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Does Not Encompass Orders on Impleadment. Denial of impleadment of a third party as a veritable party is not an appealable order under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 May 2026

The petitioner, Deepak Shripat More, filed a petition under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Housing Loan Disbursement — No Privity of Contract Between Complainant and Bank. Complainant Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as No Service Was Hired or Availed from the Appellant Bank.

20 Mar 2025

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondent (original complainant) against the appellant bank before the National Cons...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Education Trust Case — Directs Reconsideration of Recognition Cancellation. Unilateral Withdrawal of Recognition Without Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Karnataka Education Act, 1983.

14 Sep 2023

The appellants, Veerabhadreshwara Education Trust and Panchamasali Pre-University College, filed a writ appeal against the order dated 23.03.2022 pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Co-owners Not Necessary Parties as They Claim Through Same Title as Defendants. The court held that under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, petitioners claiming to be co-owners are not necessary or proper parties to a suit for specific performance when they claim through the same title as existing defendants.

3 Apr 2018

The petitioners, Natasha Dilip Singh and Dilip Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular First Appeals in Property Suit — Decree of Trial Court Set Aside for Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession Held Not Maintainable Without Impleading All Co-Sharers Under Order 1 Rule 9 of CPC, 1908.

29 Jun 2016

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleading Application in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioner Entitled to be Heard Before Compromise Decree Affecting Her Rights. The court held that a person whose rights are directly affected by a compromise decree in a subsequent suit is a necessary and proper party under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, and the trial court erred in rejecting the impleading application.

26 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Narayanamma, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (OS 2289/2007) against respondents 1 to 3 based on an agreement to...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)