Search Results for "illegal dismissal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "illegal dismissal"

3320 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3320 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Conductor in MSRTC Ticketless Travel Case — No Interference with Industrial Court's Revision Order. The court held that allowing 18 passengers to travel without tickets constitutes serious misconduct warranting dismissal under the MRTU & PULP Act, and the Industrial Court correctly set aside the Labour Court's order of reinstatement.

15 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Bhojraj Narayan Parate, was a conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC). On 15/11/1999, while on duty at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reinstatement with Full Back Wages in MSRTC Employee Termination Case — Termination Held Illegal for Violation of Natural Justice and Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that once termination is found illegal, reinstatement with full back wages is the normal rule, and the employer failed to justify denial of back wages.

13 May 2022

The petitioner, Shankar M. Gowekar, a workman employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), was terminated from service on 16/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Employer Failed to Prove Continuous Service of 240 Days Under Section 25B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, M/s. States People Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed four writ petitions challenging separate awa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Gram Panchayat Employee Challenging Dismissal for Indecent Behaviour. Termination Order Upheld as Gram Panchayat Had Power to Dismiss Under Section 61(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Procedure of Natural Justice Was Followed.

29 Jan 2016

The petitioner, Ashok Govindrao Sardar, was appointed as a Water Supply employee of Gram Panchayat Pimpalkhuta on 31 January 1986. On 12 December 2012...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding — Upholds Tribunal's Order Based on Sufficiency of Evidence and Natural Justice. The court held that the findings of the enquiry officer were not perverse and the Tribunal's order did not warrant interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.

20 Dec 2006

The petitioner, Hanumanprasad Durgaprasad Mishra, was appointed as a Junior Clerk on a purely temporary basis on 22 July 1981 and posted at the Govern...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Damages Award in Illegal Termination Suit; Cross-Objection for Higher Damages Also Considered. Judgment Under Section 96 CPC and Order XLI Rule 1 is Delivered After Remand for Quantification.

20 Feb 2015

This case involved the challenge to the termination of a managerial employee in a private limited company. H.R. Thimmappa Gowda joined Goetze (India) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Approval Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Granted for Acts of Violence on Establishment Premises. The court found no perversity in the Industrial Tribunal's decision to grant approval for dismissal based on chargesheets and a subsequent incident of violence.

28 Sep 2006

This batch of six writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India arises from orders of the Industrial Tribunal granting approval under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Disproportionate Punishment — Slapping and Tampering Certificate Not Grave Enough to Warrant Dismissal Under Section 12(1) of CRPF Act, 1949. Court Held That Punishment Must Be Proportionate to Misconduct and Disciplinary Authority Must Consider Length of Service and Nature of Charges.

31 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Ramesh Mahadu Wankhede, was appointed as a Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) in 1990. In 2007, he was involved in a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Dismissal Case, Reinstating Dismissal Order Quashed by High Court. The Court Held That Approval of Charge-Sheet by Competent Authority at Issuance Stage Is Not Mandatory If Initiation of Proceedings Was Approved, Under Civil Services Rules and Precedents.

28 Mar 2025

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a civil service officer in Jharkhand following disciplinary proceedings for misconduct involving dishonesty, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of BPCL Employee Convicted Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Petitioner Dismissed from Service Following Conviction for Demanding Illegal Gratification. Court Held That Conviction for Offence Involving Moral Turpitude Justifies Dismissal Without Full-Fledged Departmental Inquiry Under Service Rules and Article 311(2)(a) of Constitution.

15 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Shri Bharat K. Vakil, was employed as a Senior Manager (Maintenance) with Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), a government under...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)