Search Results for "idle period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "idle period"

228 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 228 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Revision in Eviction Suit, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Subletting and Bona Fide Need. Court holds that appellate court failed to properly consider evidence of subletting and that the tenant's claim of part performance under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was not established.

15 Jul 2019

The applicants, original plaintiffs and landlords, filed an eviction suit against the sole defendant-tenant in the Court of Small Causes at Bombay. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Lavasa Corporation's Second Appeals Against RERA Orders, Holding That RERA Has No Jurisdiction Over Complaints Filed Before Its Establishment. The Court ruled that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority cannot entertain complaints regarding agreements executed prior to the commencement of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

7 Aug 2018

The judgment involves three second appeals filed by Lavasa Corporation Limited against orders of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Readiness and Willingness. Agreement for Sale of Land Executed in 1975, Suit Filed in 1985, Dismissed as Time-Barred and for Failure to Prove Continuous Readiness.

4 Mar 2016

The respondent no.1/plaintiff, a cooperative housing society, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of land dated 30.1.1975, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging School Tribunal's Refusal to Condon Delay in Filing Appeals Against Termination. Held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the delay condonation applications without considering the merits of the appeals and the reasons for delay.

27 Nov 2014

The petitioners, Sangita C Thakur and Vidya V Ghosalkar, were employees of Dnyansagar Education Society. Their services were terminated by the school ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Petition for Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' application under Section 28A rejected as they failed to file within prescribed period and did not obtain reference under Section 18.

24 Feb 2014

The petitioners, three agriculturists, challenged an order dated 30.6.2011 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer, Nanded, rejecting their application...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Ground for Interference Made Out. Arbitrator's findings on facts and law are final unless perverse or contrary to public policy; reappreciation of evidence not permissible under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Feb 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Shah Jagshi Jethabhai, a construction firm, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 January 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Date of Birth Dispute Resolved in Favour of Workman. The court held that the petitioner-hospital had resorted to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act by not accepting the corrected date of birth of the workman.

28 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Tata Memorial Centre, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act and a public trust under the administrative control of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Through Rent Receipts and Admission.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Smt. Kausalyabai Kisan Chavan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and decre...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)