Search Results for "hypothetical sale"

159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition for Minor Irrigation Tank — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,50,000 per Acre with 30% Solatium and 12% Additional Market Value. Comparable Sales Method Applied Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to Fix Enhanced Compensation.

The appellants, whose land was acquired for construction of a minor irrigation tank, challenged the judgment and award of the Reference Court dated 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — No Enhancement of Compensation for Acquired Land. Appellants failed to prove entitlement to enhanced market value of Rs.2500 per sq. metre under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, owners of land acquired for road construction in Margao, Goa, challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer at R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application Seeking Section 340 CrPC Proceedings in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute for Alleged Fabrication of MHADA Affidavit. Court Finds Affidavit Was Authentic, E-filed Under Administrative Directions, and Served on All Parties, Negating Claim of Fraud on Court.

The case involved two writ petitions challenging a slum rehabilitation scheme on MHADA land in Bandra East, Mumbai. The petitioners claimed to be MHAD...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Acquiring Body's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Lack of Evidence for Enhanced Market Value. Claimants Failed to Prove Market Value Through Comparable Sales or Reliable Expert Evidence, Resulting in Restoration of Original Compensation.

The appeal was filed by the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenging the enhancemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Notice Issued Beyond Four Years Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Already Scrutinized Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Sterlite Technologies Limited, challenged a notice dated 27 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reasse...