Search Results for "grievance redressed"

157 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 157 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition for Freedom Fighter Pension Based on Civil Court Declaration. Petitioner declared first legally wedded wife entitled to pension from date of second wife's death.

The petitioner, Somitrabai @ Somabai Bhagwan Ajbe, aged 86 years, filed a writ petition seeking release of freedom fighter pension after the death of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.

The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings in Complaint Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Due to Inordinate Delay and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Magistrate's Order Without Application of Mind and 14-Year Delay in Investigation Constitute Abuse of Process, Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

The petitioners, Sayed Anwar Ahmed and Sayed Ghulam Raza Naqvi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tribunal Order in Seniority Dispute — Seniority List Must Include All Eligible Employees as on Cut-off Date.

The petitioner, Dr. Sanjay Atmaram Gaikwad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 2/12/2009 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Part for Contractual Doctors Seeking Parity in Pay and Benefits with Regular Medical Officers. Court Directs ONGC to Provide Equal Pay and Facilities but Denies Regularization.

The petitioners, a group of doctors employed on contract by the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) at its offshore installations in Bombay...