77 result(s) found
The dispute arose from a notice dated 7th February 1998 issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municip...
The petitioner, Purnartha Investment Advisers Private Limited, challenged the constitutional validity of Regulation 3(XII) of the Securities and Excha...
The appellant, Sunil Nirmal Bisth, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.1267 of 1996 for offe...
The appeal arose under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, challenging the order dated 21st August 2020 by the National Consumer Disputes...
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad addressed the issue of whether a Court Commissioner for measurement of land under Section 75 read with Order 26 Ru...
The appellants, Kamlakar Devidas Patil, Devidas Vasudev Patil, and Tarun Devidas Patil, were convicted by the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for...
