Search Results for "fiduciary duties"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "fiduciary duties"

91 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Application Under Section 434 Companies Act Seeking Transfer of Winding-Up Petition to NCLT. Applicant Argues No Irreversible Steps Taken, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.

23 Jun 2026

The matter arose from a Company Petition filed in 2010 seeking winding up of Broadcast Infratel India Private Limited on grounds of unpaid admitted de...

High Court

High Court of Madras Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax and GST Assessment Orders, Suo Motu Impleads State Bank of India. No specific legal finding or ratio is discernible from the available text.

24 Feb 2026

The High Court of Madras heard a batch of writ petitions filed by multiple corporate entities, including Aqua Terra Coke and Energy Limited (formerly ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Anticipatory Bail Application in SEBI Investigation Case — Applicant Failed to Show Prima Facie Case of No Offence Under SEBI Act and IPC. Court Held That Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Granted Where Investigation Is at Nascent Stage and Applicant's Role in Alleged Fraudulent Scheme Requires Detailed Scrutiny.

11 Sep 2025

The applicant, Rajiv Ranjan Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) in connecti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Marumakkathayam Partition Suit — Thavazhi Property Cannot Be Alienated Without Consent. The Court affirmed that properties acquired by female descendants under Marumakkathayam law constitute thavazhi property, and any partition or alienation by some members without the consent of all is void.

22 Nov 2024

The present appeal arises from a suit for partition filed by the plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the defendants (appellants) before the Addl. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in SARFAESI Act Recovery Case, Reiterates Limited Scope of Article 226 in Private Financial Disputes. The Court held that the High Court cannot entertain writ petitions challenging SARFAESI Act actions when an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the Act is available, and the interim arrangement by the Supreme Court did not confer jurisdiction to decide merits after DRT became functional.

17 Apr 2023

The case involves appeals by a lender bank against orders of the Kerala High Court that entertained writ petitions filed by borrowers (respondents) ch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Case — Agreement to Sell Void Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. Agreement executed during non-alienation period is void ab initio and not enforceable even after the restriction period ends.

26 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had upheld the decre...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award in VSS Dispute — NMR Workers Found to Have Been Coerced into Voluntary Separation Scheme. The Court confirmed reinstatement with 70% back-wages under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact.

12 Sep 2019

The case arose from a dispute between the General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa (appellant) and 90 NMR workers (responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

12 Mar 2014

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Cairn India Limited with Foreign Subsidiaries Under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court approved the transfer of Indian undertakings from four foreign subsidiaries to the Indian listed company to simplify corporate structure.

22 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Cairn India Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and listed on Indian stock exchanges, filed a petition under...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)