Search Results for "expeditious action"

562 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 562 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds 10% Deposit Condition in Arbitration Clause as Valid in Commercial Contracts. Clause requiring deposit-at-call of 10% of claim amount before invoking arbitration is not arbitrary or discriminatory under Article 14.

The case arose from a tender issued in 2008 by the Punjab State Water Supply & Sewerage Board for water supply and sewerage projects. The appellant, M...