Search Results for "drug sample analysis"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Drug Manufacturer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Prosecution for Alleged Violation of Sections 18(a)(i) and 17B(d) Held Invalid Without Prior Sanction.

The petitioners, including a pharmaceutical company and its directors/employees, challenged the criminal proceedings initiated against them in Spl.CC....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Section 50. Search of Shoulder Bag Held to Be Personal Search Requiring Mandatory Notice of Right to Be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.

The appellant, Kushal Puri, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Goa, in NDPS Case No.40/2015 for possession of 1.216 kg of charas, a commerci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Conviction in Drug Trafficking Case Under NDPS Act. Appellant's Voluntary Statement Under Section 67 and Foreign Seizure Evidence Are Primary Bases for Trial Court's Verdict.

The High Court of Bombay heard Criminal Appeal No.783 of 2000 against the judgment of the Special Judge, NDPS, Mumbai, dated October 11, 2000, in NDPS...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NDPS Proceedings Against Petitioner for Lack of Evidence of Conscious Possession and Commercial Quantity. Court holds that mere presence in a vehicle with contraband does not constitute possession under Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of NDPS Act without proof of knowledge and control.

The petitioner, Mr. Kalam Narendra, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Key Issue Raised is Whether Prosecution Proved Exclusive and Conscious Possession of Charas by the Accused.

The High Court of Bombay heard two criminal appeals against convictions under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The prosecutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Secretary in Food Safety Violation — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Role. Secretary Not Present at Sampling, Complaint Lacks Averment of Responsibility Under Section 59 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The applicant, Hemant Sukaji Funde, was the Secretary of Gurukrupa Adiwasi Prathmik and Madhyamik Ashramshala, Thana, Amgaon, Gondia. He was arraigned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Reliance on Inadmissible Section 67 Statements. Conviction for Possession of Heroin Set Aside as Mandatory Safeguards Were Not Followed and Confessional Statements Were Inadmissible Under Tofan Singh.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of Anwarkhan Jahilkhan Pathan and Firdoskhan Khurshidkhan Pathan against their conviction under the Narcotic Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 21(c), 23(c) read with 28 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of contraband beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS...