Search Results for "demand verification"

950 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 950 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award for Rabies Vaccine Supply. Performance Certificate Not in Prescribed Proforma Held Directory, Not Mandatory, as Substantial Compliance and Public Interest Justify Award.

The petitioners, Bharat Biotech International Ltd, challenged the grant of a contract by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) for the su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Invalid Service of Demand Notice. Notice sent by speed post but not delivered to correct address; court holds that service of notice is mandatory under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Salim s/o Jilani Qureshi, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jaysing Nayrana Bidgar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Aarif Ali Yusuf Ali Sayyad, was convicted by the Special Judge, Dhule, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand Verification and Inconsistent Evidence. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Trap Witnesses Did Not Support Prosecution Case Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23rd October 2012 passed by the Special Judge, Kolhapur acquitting the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved. Acquittal of Police Head Constable Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Ramesh Tukaram Wagh, a Police Head Constable, in Special Case (PCA) No.4/2012 by the...