Search Results for "custodial disclosure"

95 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Rape of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Incriminating Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Sharad Bhaskar Rajnor, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, for offences under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused in UAPA and BNS Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 13 of UAPA — Failure to Obtain Prior Approval from Central Government Renders Investigation Invalid

The case involves two criminal petitions filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking quashing of FIR in Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Mentally Retarded Woman Due to Lack of Consent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376(2)(l) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove absence of consent and knowledge of mental retardation.

The present appeal challenged the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 376(2)(l) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the rape o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and In-laws for Murder of Married Woman by Burning. Circumstantial evidence including dying declaration and motive for dowry demand established guilt under Sections 302, 316, 498-A read with 34 IPC.

The appellants, Channappa Kallappa Hipargi (husband), Kallappa Shatyappa Hipargi (father-in-law), and Jakavva Kallappa Hipargi (mother-in-law), were c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anwar Musa Sayyed, Salim Musa Sayyed, and Afsar Niyaz Sayyed, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Alibaug, for the murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence — Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 302 IPC was not perverse and did not warrant interference.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment of acquittal dated 10...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, six individuals, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malshiras, for offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 506 Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Over Land Dispute — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient. Brothers convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for killing neighbour; court finds motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anandrao Bapuso Patil and Vilas @ Balaso Bapuso Patil, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of Bhanudas under ...