High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Multiple Motor Accident Claims Appeals Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Appeals Filed by Insurance Companies and Claimants Challenging Awards of Compensation by MACTs.
22 Dec 2020...
Search Results for "coverage clause"
415 result(s) found
Found 415 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Part, Holding Insurance Company Not Liable for Interest on Workmen Compensation; Interest Liability Rests on Employers Under Section 4-A(3)(a) of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, as Contractual Policy Did Not Cover Interest. The Court Modified the Commissioner's Order to Exonerate the Insurer from Interest Payment.
12 Apr 2023The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with two appeals filed under Section 30(1) of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, arising from the s...
- 14
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal of Injured Pillion Rider in Motor Accident Claim Regarding Liability and Interest. Insurance Company Held Liable Despite Driver Having Licence for Autorickshaw but not Goods Autorickshaw, Following Mukund Dewangan, and Interest Enhanced to 9% Due to Long Delay.
22 Jul 2026The appeal arose from an award by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition filed by a pillion rider who sustained grievous injuries in a...
- 55
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Appeals in Motor Accident and Workmen Compensation Cases — Upholds Awards for Injured Driver and Deceased Worker's Dependents. Insurer's Liability Affirmed Despite Alleged Policy Violations and Lack of Driving License.
5 Jan 2015This judgment involves multiple Miscellaneous First Appeals filed by insurance companies against awards of compensation under the Workmen's Compensati...
- 58
High Court
- 36
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Partially Allows Employer's Appeal and Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Employer Liable for 50% of Compensation Due to Lack of Insurance Coverage for Deceased Worker. The court upheld the apportionment of liability between employer and insurer but modified interest to apply only on employer's share from accident date.
2 Aug 2021The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment dated 28.10.2010 passed by the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, ...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Eviction Orders under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. The dispute centered on whether Shop No. 8 in Indian Mercantile Mansion constituted public premises and whether the original tenant had unlawfully sublet the premises and permitted unauthorized structural changes, thereby rendering the occupants unauthorised under Section 2(g) of the Act.
28 Feb 2017The dispute pertained to Shop No. 8, Ground Floor, Indian Mercantile Mansion, Mumbai, which was owned by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd (Insurer),...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Hears First Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Rs.1.45 Crore Insurance Claim for Vessel Capsizing - Court Examines Peril of the Sea Coverage Under Marine Hull Policy. Appellant sought decree for total loss and sue and labour expenses, contending that ingress of sea water from grounding constituted a covered peril; respondent disputed proximate cause and repudiated claim.
8 May 2014The appeal arose from a judgment of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Panaji, which dismissed Special Civil Suit No. 105/90. The appellant, a salvage c...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Owner Not Liable for Compensation as Driver Had Valid License and Insurance Policy Covered Risk. The court held that under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the insurer is liable to pay compensation when the driver has a valid license and the policy is in force.
21 Mar 2023The appellant, Sri Gopalakrishna G Nayak, owner of a Bajaj luggage carrier auto rickshaw, filed this appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles...
- 315
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI Circular Excluding Primary Cooperative Credit Societies from Deposit Insurance Coverage. Circular dated 22.02.2008 Held Valid as It Merely Clarifies Existing Definition Under Section 2(g) of DICGC Act, 1961.
30 Nov -0001The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by cooperative credit societies challenging a circular dated 22.02.2008 issued by the Reserve Bank of I...
- 112
