Search Results for "court fees valuation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "court fees valuation"

496 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 496 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Returning Plaint for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Suit for Injunction and Damages. The Court Held That for Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Only Plaint Averments Are Relevant, Not Evidence.

5 Aug 2022

The appellant, Bharat Bhushan Gupta, filed a suit for mandatory and prohibitory injunction and recovery of damages against the respondents, Pratap Nar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Held That Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Court Fees Issue Was Curable. The Court restored the suit for trial, emphasizing that the High Court impermissibly conducted a mini-trial at the threshold stage.

21 Apr 2026

The appellant, M/s. Marg Limited, a real estate developer, purchased land in Chennai in 2002 and constructed a commercial IT building. In 2011 and 201...

High Court

High Court Hears Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities. Award Directed Petitioner Company to Pay Net Amount After Allowing Counter Claim, Raising Issues of Service of Counter Claim and Natural Justice.

13 Jun 2024

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging in part an Arbitral Award dated 23rd Novemb...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.4520 OF 2014

30 Apr 2015

The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity and propriety of a notification dated January 29, 2014, issued by the Finance Department of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds It Lacks Jurisdiction to Decide Amendment Application in Suit Slated for Transfer Due to Loss of Pecuniary Jurisdiction. The Court cannot retain jurisdiction to decide an amendment application seeking to increase suit valuation after the Bombay City Civil Court (Amendment) Act, 2023 came into force, as the suit already falls within the enhanced pecuniary jurisdiction of the City Civil Court.

23 Feb 2024

The Bombay High Court was tasked with deciding whether it retains jurisdiction to entertain an application for amendment of plaint seeking to increase...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Valuation of Partners' Interest in Firms Based on Market Quotation of Shares as on Assessee's Valuation Date in Wealth Tax Reference. The court held that the valuation date for the assessee's interest in a firm is the assessee's own valuation date, not the firm's accounting year-end, under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.

29 Jan 2016

This is a reference under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, arising from eight reference applications by different assessees (members of the Bajaj family) aft...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Market Value Determination for Share Valuation in Oppression Case — Director's Rights Cease Upon Valuation. The court held that the market value determined by the Company Law Board for shares held by a minority shareholder was just and proper, and that the shareholder ceases to be a director upon valuation, not upon payment.

16 Jun 2005

The case involves two appeals filed against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 5.5.2003 in Company Petition No. 12 of 1998. The appellant, ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal Order in Commercial Suit — Suit Not Barred by Arbitration Clause as Reliefs Are Not Covered by Arbitration Agreement.

1 Feb 2024

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants/defendants challenging the order dated 03.02.2023 passed by the Commercial Court at...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)