Search Results for "coparceners"

251 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 251 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. The court held that the suit for partition was not barred by limitation as the plaintiff's possession was not adverse and the defendants failed to prove ouster.

The case pertains to a Regular First Appeal filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 passed by the Senior Civil Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Filed by Legal Heirs of Defendant Against Decree in Partition Suit. Appeals Arise from Common Judgment Partly Decreeing Suit for Partition and Separate Possession of Ancestral Properties.

The appeals arose from a common judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.2640/1988 and O.S.No.5075/2000 by the I Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Invalidity of Partnership Between HUF Karta and Its Member in Income Tax Registration Case. Partnership Deed Between Karta and Coparcener of Same HUF Held Void as No Valid Contract Possible Under Section 4 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal of Daughters in Partition Suit — Upholds Equal Share in Ancestral Property. Daughters Held Entitled to Coparcenary Rights Under Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Despite Non-Joinder of Some Parties.

The case pertains to a partition suit filed by the daughters of B.R. Krishnamurthy Rao seeking a share in the joint family property. The plaintiffs, S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance in Property Sale Dispute — Property Held Self-Acquired Despite Ancestral Origin. Property received in partition is self-acquired and vendor competent to alienate without consent of other family members.

The present second appeal arises from a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The respondent-plaintiff Raghunath ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Daughters' Partition Suit: Res Judicata Bars Second Rejection Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Daughters as Class I heirs under Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act can maintain partition suit despite prior partition, and Section 6(5) is not a jurisdictional bar.

The appeal arises from a suit for partition filed by three daughters of a Hindu male who died intestate on 06.03.1985. The propositus was survived by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Disposes Writ Petition Under Article 227 of Constitution of India, Directs Trial Court to Reconsider Compromise Decree in Ancestral Property Dispute Involving Fraud Allegations

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India to quash a compromise decree in OS No. 123/2025, alleging it was frau...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Restrains Interference and Construction Pending Suit. Prima facie case established regarding joint family property and partnership firm rights under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appellants, Mr. Parth Ghorpade and Mr. Sarvajeet Ghorpade, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) read with Section 151 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment Application in Partition Suit Under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Petitioners, claiming to be daughters-in-law and sons of the original defendant, have a direct interest in the suit property and are necessary parties for effective adjudication.

The petitioners, Madhuri Pandurang Chavan, Kishori Nivas Gaikwad, Jayprakash Ananda Paymal, and Vaibhav Ananda Paymal, filed a writ petition under Art...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Succession Dispute Over Joint Family Property — Restrains Alienation of Agricultural Land Pending Suit. The court held that plaintiffs, as Class I heirs, had a prima facie case for partition and injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The case involves a family dispute over agricultural land and other properties left by the deceased B.M. Raghothama Rao. The plaintiffs, comprising hi...