Search Results for "contradictory pleas"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "contradictory pleas"

121 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 121 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Derivative Transaction Dispute Based on Signed ISDA Agreement. Court Finds No Ground to Interfere Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Arbitrator's Findings on Enforceability Are Reasonable.

6 Jul 2012

The dispute arose from two foreign exchange derivative transactions entered into between Sporting India Limited (the Petitioner) and HDFC Bank Limited...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court's Rs. 50 Lakh Cost and CBI Probe in Habeas Corpus Case Involving Allegations of Illegal Detention and Political Mudslinging. High Court Had Found the Petition an Abuse of Process, Imposed Costs, and Directed CBI Investigation Against the Petitioner.

1 Aug 2026

The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) dated 7 March 2011, dismissing a habeas corpus writ petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act to Arbitral Award Concerning Lease Agreement and Income Tax Depreciation Issues.

16 Jul 2013

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CGIT Award Holding Canteen Contract as Sham and Bogus, Directs Absorption of Canteen Workers as Direct Employees of Principal Employer. Contract Labour Arrangement Found to Be a Mere Facade with Principal Employer Exercising Complete Control Over Workers, Making Them Direct Employees Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

26 Jul 2016

The petitioner, The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd., a public company, challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1 (CGIT...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Will in Testamentary Suit, Dismisses Caveat by Heirs. Court Declares Will Dated 3rd December 1988 as Valid Last Will and Testament of Deceased Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav, Orders Issuance of Letter of Administration.

22 Dec 2016

The case pertains to a testamentary dispute concerning the Will of deceased Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav. The plaintiffs, Subhash Hirji Jadhav and his...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

23 Dec 2016

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bank Officials in Security Guard Board Complaint — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Prosecution for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust by bank officials in relation to security guard services fails as prior sanction for acts done in official capacity was not obtained.

16 Apr 2013

The petitioners, officers of Bank of Baroda (a nationalized bank), were facing criminal proceedings initiated by the Security Guard Board for Greater ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petitions in Land Dispute Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petitions under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC dismissed as petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record or discovery of new evidence.

24 Jul 2025

The judgment pertains to two review petitions filed by Sri. Prakash Gangaram (represented by GPA holder Sri. Subbaramaiah) against the Deputy Commissi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiary in Probate Revocation Petition — Natural Justice Requires Hearing for Affected Parties. The court held that a beneficiary under a Will is a necessary and proper party to a revocation petition as their rights would be directly affected by the revocation of probate.

9 Jul 2013

The Bombay High Court allowed a Chamber Summons filed by Pradeep Manek Shahani seeking his impleadment as respondent no.2 in Misc. Petition No. 87 of ...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)