Search Results for "consumer protection rules 2020"

186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicates Trademark Opposition Over 'Big Bite' Mark in Class 30. Court Considers Application of Prior User Test and Relevance of Trans-Border Reputation Under Trademarks Act, 1999.

The appeals were filed under Section 91 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 against a common order dated 18.7.2014 by the Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax and GST Assessment Orders, Suo Motu Impleads State Bank of India. No specific legal finding or ratio is discernible from the available text.

The High Court of Madras heard a batch of writ petitions filed by multiple corporate entities, including Aqua Terra Coke and Energy Limited (formerly ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviewed Writ Petition Against IPAB Order Cancelling Pharmaceutical Trademark Registration. The Court Examined Whether Rectification Application Was Maintainable Under Section 124 Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Whether IPAB Correctly Applied Deceptive Similarity Test to Cancel OFLOMAC Mark.

The dispute concerned pharmaceutical trademarks OFLOMAC and OFRAMAX. Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, the petitioner, challenged an order of the Inte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Co-operative Society Disciplinary Case — Upholds Punishment of Stoppage of Increment with Cumulative Effect. Appellant's Admission of Charges and Proper Enquiry Justify Penalty Under Discipline and Appeal Rules.

The appellant, P. Thiyagarajan, was a Special Officer in a Co-operative Society. A charge memo dated 24.06.2005 was issued by the Deputy Registrar all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...