Search Results for "compensation under 2013 Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "compensation under 2013 Act"

3707 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3707 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Lapsed as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Despite Award Made in 2008.

2 May 2019

The petitioners, Reliance Natural Resources Limited and its director Murli Manohar Purohit, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 by Numerous Temple Trusts. Petitioners Sought Declaration that the Amendment Act is Unconstitutional and Discriminatory under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

17 Nov 2015

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Passes Judgment in Multiple Motor Accident Claim Appeals

22 Dec 2020

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Passing of Award Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 11A of 1894 Act.

9 Jan 2018

The matter involved a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by landowners whose agricultural lands in Mahajenaha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landowners' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case for Re-determination Under Section 28-A. The Court held that Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, being a beneficial provision, permits re-determination of compensation based on appellate court awards to ensure equality among similarly placed landowners, overriding a strict interpretation of the definition of 'Court' under Section 3(d).

25 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Hubballi-Ankola Broad Gauge Line, where the appellants, landowners, lost their land and we...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Writ Petitions Filed Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners Sought Declaration That 1977-78 BDA Land Acquisition Had Lapsed Due to Non-Taking of Possession or Non-Payment of Compensation.

14 Dec 2017

These three sets of writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, all relating to the acquisition of land measuring seven acres in Sur...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Impleading Orders in Land Acquisition References — Reference Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Allowing Impleading Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Without Adjudicating Title. The Court Held That the Land Acquisition Act is a Complete Code and Third Parties Must Establish Title Before a Civil Court.

20 Dec 2024

The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi, presided over by Justice, delivered a common judgment on 20 December 2024 in three connected writ petitions...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Four Petitions Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act by Common Order. Interim Measures Sought by Financing Company Against Borrower and Guarantor for Default in Loan Repayments Secured by Hypothecated Equipment.

8 Jul 2014

L&T Finance Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed four petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)