Search Results for "cheque payment"

1842 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1842 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proof of Debt. Security Cheque for Future Sponsorship Does Not Attract Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Smt. Ranju Batra, proprietor of M/s Admark Incorporated, filed two criminal appeals against the acquittal of respondent no. 1, Bhushan ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Service of Statutory Notice Valid Despite Unsigned Office Copy. Absence of Signature on Office Copy of Demand Notice Does Not Invalidate Service Under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Vardhman Steel, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Sai Engineering, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Restores Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Accused's Assurance to Honour Cheque on Re-deposit Does Not Bar Prosecution When Complaint Filed Within Limitation.

The appellant, Ex-Major Uday Sathe, was the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. He sold 50 equit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Appellant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was rebutted by the accused, and the acquittal was proper.

The appellant, M/s. IVY Jewellery Pvt Ltd, a company dealing in diamond jewellery, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Cheque Dishonour Case — Defendant's Admission of Liability and Failure to Disclose Triable Issues Leads to Decree. The court held that a bare assertion without documentary evidence does not constitute a triable issue under Order 37 CPC.

The plaintiff filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to recover amounts lent and advanced to the defendant, based o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Delayed Statutory Notice. Notice Issued Beyond 30 Days from Cheque Dishonour Renders Complaint Not Maintainable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Smt. M. Shashikala, was facing trial in a complaint filed by the respondent, Sri Krishna Murthy, under Section 138 of the Negotiable I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Demand Notice as Required by Section 138(b) of the Act.

The petitioner, M/s Soft-touch Computer through its proprietor Shashikant Bhaskar Zope, filed three criminal writ petitions under Section 482 of the C...