Search Results for "beneficiary hearing"

549 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 549 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Applicant in Cheating and Forgery Case — Investigation Complete, No Custodial Interrogation Required. Pre-arrest bail allowed under Section 438 CrPC for offences under Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, 340 BNS as investigation complete and applicant cooperated.

The applicant, Haribhau Dnyandev Chemte, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking pre-arrest bail in co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cyber Fraud Case — Directs Bank to Refund Rs. 76.9 Lakhs Under RBI Circular. Unauthorized Addition of Beneficiaries and Absence of OTP Constitute Deficiency in Service Under RBI Circular Dated 6 July 2017.

The petitioners, a director and a closely held family company, maintained a bank account with Respondent No. 2 for 15-20 years. On 1 October 2022, unk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for BAPS Temple Construction — Acquisition Upheld as Valid Public Purpose Under MRTP Act, 1966. Petitioners lacked locus standi and filed petition after 10-year delay, leading to dismissal.

The petitioners, Mr. Salim Naim Khan and Mrs. Reshma Salim Khan, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of land by the State of Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit Challenging Will on Grounds of Suspicious Circumstances and Lack of Testamentary Capacity. Will dated 9th March 1981 held not duly executed and attested as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case concerns a testamentary suit filed by Sulochana Dinanath Tarkar (since deceased, represented by her sons Sunil and Harish) seeking Letters of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit for Non-Prosecution and Failure to Prove Will Execution. Plaintiff failed to examine attesting witnesses or produce evidence to prove due execution of Will under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The plaintiff, Romeo Anacleto D'Souza, filed a testamentary petition seeking probate of the Will dated 26th May 1986 of his mother, Mrs Ermina Pinto D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Konkan Railway Corporation in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication on Merits. Non-joinder of Acquiring Body as Party in Land Reference Proceedings Held Fatal to Award-Decree.

The case involves a land acquisition for the Konkan Railway project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer acquired 78.40 Ares of land from the respond...