Search Results for "appointment against advertisement"

1069 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1069 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Regularization of Staff Nurses (Stipendiary) in Light of Umadevi (3) Principle. Temporary Employees Claim Permanent Absorption After Nearly Two Decades of Service, Raising Equal Pay for Equal Work Under Articles 14 and 16.

The writ petitions were filed by ten Staff Nurses (Stipendiary) working at the Jayadev Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research since their a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reservation for SC/ST in Direct Recruitment to District Judge Posts — Backlog Vacancies Filled by Lowering Cut-Off Marks Valid Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of the Constitution.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by general category candidates challenging the decision of the High Court of Judicature at Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Quashing Advertisement for Director Post in RIMS, Imphal. Court Holds That High Court Erred in Going Into Validity of Recruitment Rules Without Challenge and in Holding That Non-Notification of Rules Invalidates Advertisement.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a common judgment of the High Court of Manipur that quashed an advertisement dated 16.08.2016 invitin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Reappointment of District Forum Presidents Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 10(2) of the Act Prescribes a Single Term of Five Years or Until Age 65, Barring Reappointment.

The judgment addresses a common question arising in multiple writ petitions: whether the President of a District Forum constituted under Section 10 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Disabled Employee in Service Dispute Against Trust and Welfare Authorities — Appointment of Person with Disability Upheld Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Third Party Lacks Locus Standi to Challenge Appointment of Disabled Person Under Section 33 of the Act.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from writ petitions concerning the appointment of Smt. Vaishali Walmik Bagul, a person with 50% d...