Search Results for "agricultural produce marketing"

227 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 227 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election Process of Agricultural Produce Market Committee — No Interference in Election Programme After Notification Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Shamrao Narhari Pavale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the election process of the Agricultural Produc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Agricultural Marketing Board Rules for Preferential Allotment to Displaced Dealers. Conditions of Three Years Licensing and Minimum Turnover of Rs.5 Lakhs Held Valid and Not Violative of Article 14.

The case involves appeals against judgments of the Punjab and Haryana High Court concerning the validity and interpretation of the Punjab State Agricu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Orders of District Deputy Registrar in Election Nomination Dispute. Requirement of Declaration Under Rule 45 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967 Held Mandatory.

The petitioner, Gyanba s/o Trimbakrao Shirale, challenged the orders of the District Deputy Registrar, Parbhani, which allowed appeals filed by respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Dropping Land Acquisition Proceedings in Collusion Case — Land Reserved for Agricultural Produce Market Committee Since 1993 Cannot Be Released Without Following Statutory Procedure Under MRTP Act, 1966.

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Anjangaon Surji, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Land Acquisition Officer, Minor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to State Notification Fixing Sugarcane Price Despite Central FRP Under Essential Commodities Act. Section 6 of the EC Act Grants Overriding Effect to Central Orders Over Inconsistent State Enactments.

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the state government's notification fixing sugarcane price and the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination for APMC Election Due to Disqualification Under Section 16 of M.S. Act, 1960. Respondent No. 4 was disqualified as a defaulter of a cooperative society, yet nomination was improperly accepted.

The petitioners, Dinkar Uttamrao Patil and Pundlik Raoji Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...