Search Results for "Valuation Rules"

836 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 836 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Valuation Case — Sequential Application of Valuation Rules Mandatory. Rule 7 and Rule 9 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 Cannot Be Applied Without First Considering Rules 4 and 5 for Identical or Similar Goods.

The case involves appeals by M/s. Diyas Mantra Lighting Private Limited and its directors against orders of the Principal Commissioner of Customs (Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Transfer of Writ Petitions and Contempt Petition from Aurangabad Bench to Principal Seat Under Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960. Legality of Chief Justice's Administrative Transfer Orders and Validity of Proviso to Rule 2 of Chapter XXXI Raised.

The Bombay High Court heard three writ petitions filed by the Lawyers' Forum for General Utility & Litigating Public, Aurangabad, challenging the admi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Return in Suit for Possession Against Gratuitous Licensee. Court Holds That Suit for Recovery of Possession Against Gratuitous Licensee Is Exclusively Triable by Small Causes Court Under Presidency Small Causes Court Act, 1882.

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 7 May 2014 of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellant's (original d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Electricity Bill Dispute — Sets Aside Lower Appellate Court's Judgment for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. First appellate court must independently assess evidence and give reasons for reversal of trial court's findings.

The appellant, Sureshkumar S/o Rochiram Jagyasi, was a customer of the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (respondent) and operat...