Search Results for "Tender notification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Tender notification"

450 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 450 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

30 Jan 2026

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Lokayukta Investigation Reference as Withdrawn. Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking quashing of reference of investigation to Upa-Lokayukta under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 dismissed as withdrawn without adjudication on merits.

13 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Shri Nagarajappa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of L-1 Bidder in Water Tanker Supply Tender — Arbitrary Action by Tender Inviting Authority Set Aside. Court holds that disqualification of the lowest bidder without prior notice or opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice and is unsustainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

6 Mar 2024

The petitioner, M/s H.P. Ghumare, a contractor engaged in water supply through tankers since 2021, participated in an e-tender notice dated 13 July 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction for Tender Process in Government Procurement Under National AYUSH Mission. The court held that paragraph 4(vi)(b) of the Operational Guidelines requires a transparent tendering process among eligible establishments, including IMPCL, Public Sector Undertakings, state government pharmacies, and cooperatives, to ensure competition and quality in the procurement of Ayurvedic medicines.

3 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a petition filed by Kerala Ayurvedic Co-operative Society Limited before the Lucknow Bench of the High Court of Judicature at A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award in E-Auction Dispute Due to Technical Glitch and Lack of Arbitrariness. Connectivity failure at service provider's end justified resumption of auction; High Court's interference in commercial decision set aside.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (BCCL) against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which had quashed the ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal by Unsuccessful Bidder in Tender Matter — No Arbitrariness Found in Rejection of Bid for Non-Compliance with Tender Conditions. The court upheld the rejection of the bid for failure to submit a mandatory consent letter, affirming the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters.

15 Nov 2018

The appellant, Mahindra Sanyo Special Steel Private Limited, an unsuccessful bidder, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of its bid in Ten...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, even if possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition matter where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, regardless of whether possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition proceeding where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree Holder's Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Interest Dispute — Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable from Date of Possession, Not Notification Under Section 4(1). The court clarified that Section 28 explicitly provides for interest from the date of possession, and the executing court's contrary view was erroneous.

28 Feb 2013

The petitioners, M.V. Subba Rao and M.M.G. Prasad, were owners of land in Singapore Village, Sindhanoor Taluk, Raichur District, which was acquired fo...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)