Search Results for "Securitisation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Securitisation"

417 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 417 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Purchaser's Challenge to SARFAESI Action; Sale During Injunction Void. Sale of Mortgaged Property During Pendency of Injunction Order Held Void; Purchaser Has No Right to Question Prior Equitable Mortgage Under Section 58(f) of Transfer of Property Act.

10 Mar 2017

The writ petition challenged the orders of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) and the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dismissing the petitione...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantor's Property — Maintains That Guarantor Is a 'Borrower' Under Section 2(1)(f) of SARFAESI Act and That Writ Jurisdiction Is Not Available When Alternative Statutory Remedy Exists Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.

20 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Mr. Latif Yusuf Manikkoth, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the possession notice issued by the Bank of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.

25 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Secured Creditor's Priority Over Sales Tax Dues in MVAT Act Attachment Dispute. State Bank of India's mortgage charge on borrower's property held superior to VAT recovery under Section 32 of MVAT Act, 2002, following Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala ratio.

17 Dec 2020

The State Bank of India (SBI), a secured creditor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the attachment of a propert...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case, Upholding High Court Order Setting Aside District Magistrate's Decision. District Magistrate's Role Under Section 14 is Limited to Assisting Secured Creditor in Taking Possession, Not Adjudicating Tenancy Disputes, and Tenant's Remedy Lies Under Section 17 Before Debt Recovery Tribunal.

26 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Procedural Non-Compliance. The court found that the appellant bank failed to adhere to the requirements under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, despite the respondent's loan default and non-payment of a one-time settlement.

22 Jan 2024

The dispute arose from a loan transaction in 1996, where the respondent, a sole proprietor of a firearms business, borrowed Rs. 2,00,000 from the appe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Revision Application by Bank in SARFAESI Act Jurisdiction Dispute — Civil Court Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Allegations of Fraud Must Be Specific and Supported by Material to Bypass Statutory Remedy Before Debt Recovery Tribunal.

29 Apr 2010

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Punjab National Bank (original defendant) against an order of the District Judge, Chandrapur, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Technical Defect in Demand Notice Not Fatal When No Prejudice Caused. The Court held that a mere inadvertent use of a different group company name on the demand notice does not invalidate proceedings under the SARFAESI Act if the borrower was not misled and no substantial prejudice was caused.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between M/s. L&T Housing Finance Limited (appellant) and M/s. Trishul Developers and another (respondents) concerning ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors — Personal Guarantee Not a 'Right or Interest in Property' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Guarantors Cannot Challenge Possession Notice Before Debt Recovery Tribunal Under SARFAESI; Remedy Lies Under RDDB Act, 1993.

10 Mar 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mahindra Chandrasen and Sharad Chandrasen (petitioners) against Union Bank of India and other respon...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Matter — Upholds Bank's Possession for Non-Performing Asset. Held that DRT's refusal to grant interim relief was not perverse or without jurisdiction, and the petition under Article 226/227 was not maintainable as alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act was available.

13 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Prakashbhai Baldevbhai Patel and another, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India b...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)