Search Results for "Section 49(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 49(3)"

264 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 264 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pay Parity Under Article 226, Directing Municipal Corporation to Grant Equal Pay for Equal Work to Absorbed Employees. The Court Held That Employees Performing Similar Duties Are Entitled to Pay Parity Irrespective of Appointment Basis, Under the Principle of Equal Pay for Equal Work, and Directed a Time-Bound Decision on Their Proposal Within Three Months.

9 Mar 2026

The dispute involved 28 Petitioners, former employees of Gram Panchayats absorbed into the Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation after its formation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Lease Rent Revision Based on Ready Reckoner Rates for Housing Societies in Bandra. Court holds that linkage of lease rent to land value is not per se prohibited and the Government Resolutions of 2006, 2012, and 2018 are constitutionally valid.

10 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, upheld the constitutional validity of Government Resolutions (GRs) dated 29th May 2006, 12th Dece...

High Court

Writ Petition Questions Appellate Court's Order on Property Rights and Compensation

13 Jun 2024

Writ petition challenging an appellate court's order regarding an injunction and the withdrawal of compensation. The dispute arises from ancestral pro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Civil Procedure Amendment Case Regarding Mortgage Redemption Suit. The court upheld the lower courts' orders allowing amendment of plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, holding that issues of limitation and res judicata should be decided at trial, not at the amendment stage.

14 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from a property in Ballia, where the plaintiffs claimed ownership of a shop and filed Suit No. 154 of 2009 for possession upon ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

3 Mar 2022

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Execution Application for Interest on Arbitral Award During Pendency of Challenge — Bank Guarantee Furnished Under Supreme Court Order Constitutes Payment into Court Under Order 21 Rule 1 CPC

1 Mar 2017

The case involves an execution application filed by Bhadani Associates (the claimant/decree-holder) seeking to enforce an arbitral award dated 16th Ja...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Non-Delivery Case — Notice Under Section 106 of Railways Act, 1989 Must Be Liberally Constructed. The court held that the notice dated 25-01-1993 was valid and the claim was not barred by limitation, as the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to the Railway Claims Tribunal.

11 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Sapna Emporium, filed a first appeal against the judgment and order dated 22-09-1995 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bombay...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Railway Non-Delivery Case Due to Invalid Notice Under Section 106 of Railways Act, 1989. Notice Served Beyond Six-Month Limitation Period and Addressed to Wrong Authority.

4 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Sapna Emporium, filed a first appeal against the judgment and order dated 22-09-1995 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bombay...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeals in Confiscation of Pay Orders — Genuine Foreign Exchange Transactions Not Sale Proceeds of Smuggled Goods. Pay orders received by FFMC for sale of foreign exchange in genuine transactions cannot be confiscated under Section 121 of the Customs Act, 1962 merely because the purchaser's bank account contained proceeds of smuggling.

30 Mar 2012

The appellant, Weizmann Limited, a Full Fledged Money Changer (FFMC), sold foreign exchange to various purchasers and received pay orders from banks. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Investigation — Section 156(3) CrPC Order Set Aside as Magistrate Failed to Apply Judicial Mind. The Court held that the Magistrate must apply judicial mind before ordering investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC and cannot act as a post office.

3 May 2006

The petitioner, Jitendra Chandrakant Mehta, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of proceedings arising out of...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)