Search Results for "Section 304A IPC"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Upheld as Prosecution Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The applicant, Sudhir s/o Kalidas Deshmukh, a driver employed with the S.T. Depot, Soyegaon, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Soy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctors in Medical Negligence Case Due to Lack of Criminal Intent. Section 304 IPC Not Attracted as Allegations Do Not Disclose Culpable Homicide; Civil Liability May Exist but Criminal Prosecution Requires Gross Negligence with Mens Rea.

The applicants, Dr. Ashok Saklecha and Dr. Sarika Saklecha, medical practitioners, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death and Injuries in Hit-and-Run Case. Revision Petitioner's Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC and Section 134(a)(b) r/w 187 MV Act Confirmed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Was Clear.

The revision petitioner, Mr. Vimanjan Hanumanta Devarkonda, was the original accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident that occurred on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion and Prima Facie Case Under Section 304-A IPC. FIR and charge-sheet quashed as no expert opinion obtained to establish medical negligence.

The applicant, Dr. Pramod Yashwantrao Gurjar, an Obstetric and Gynecology Surgeon, performed a cesarean surgery on Smt. Kanchan Atul Kulkarni on 06.03...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Rash and Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident on 30.10.2016 at about 2.15 p.m. on Mohanur to Karur Road near Vangal Bridge. The defacto complainant Jagadeeswar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Section 187 MV Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Dyaniyal S/o Malku Army, was convicted by the Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Humnabad in C.C. No. 309/2019 for offences under Se...