Search Results for "Section 26"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Decision in Property Title Dispute Due to Lack of Evidence on Power of Attorney. Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts Restored as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Compliance with Registration Act for Foreign-Executed Document.

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the original plaintiffs seeking declaration of title and recovery of possession over a property, all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Priority Dispute Between SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act. SARFAESI Act's Express Priority Provisions Under Section 26E Prevail Over MSMED Act's Recovery Mechanism, as No Conflict Exists and Priority Must Be Expressly Provided.

The dispute arose from conflicting recovery claims under the SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act against a debtor, Mission Vivacare, which had defaulted on loa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Judgment and Remands Income Tax Appeals for Fresh Adjudication. High Court Erred in Disposing of Appeal Without Discussing Issues Arising for Consideration Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute originated from income tax assessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2012-13, where the Assessing Officer added Rs. 7,78,00,000 to the as...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in University Appointment Case Due to Non-Binding UGC Regulations. Appointment of Vice Chancellor Upheld as Sardar Patel University Act, 1955 Does Not Prescribe Qualifications and State Has Not Adopted UGC Regulations Through Legislation.

The dispute involved a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the appointment of respondent No.4 as Vice Chancellor of Sardar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...