Search Results for "Section 23A"

107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Coal Supply Dispute Due to Absence of Arbitration Agreement in Purchase Orders. Tax Invoices with Arbitration Clause Not Binding as They Were Unilateral and Not Accepted by Respondent.

The applicant, Hitesh Coal Traders, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Circular Restricting Land Compensation Under Consent Award. Circular dated 27.02.2020 Held Ultra Vires the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 and Maharashtra Rules, 2014.

The petitioner, Sanjay Mahadeo Japkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Government Circular...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings of Fact in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute. Petitioner failed to establish tenancy rights as adopted son of deceased tenant due to lack of credible evidence and introduction of new pleas at belated stage.

The petitioner, Premanand Naik, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders of the Appellate Authority...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Registration of Document Despite Pending Stamp Duty Adjudication — Period of Adjudication Excluded for Limitation Under Section 23 of Registration Act. Sub-Registrar Cannot Refuse Registration on Ground of Pending Adjudication Under Section 31 of Maharashtra Stamp Act.

The petitioner, Snehanjali Electronics and Trading Private Limited, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub-Registrar, Andheri I (Respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Multinational Company in Rent Control Case. Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 exempts premises let to multinational companies from protection of the Act, and concurrent findings of fact are not interfered with under Section 115 CPC.

The applicant, Eloff Hansson (India) Pvt. Ltd., was a tenant in office premises in Mumbai. The respondents, landlords, terminated the tenancy in 1993 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint Against Foreign Sovereign in Suit for Damages Due to Lack of Consent Under Section 86 CPC. Suit Against Queen of Netherlands Dismissed as Foreign Sovereign Immune from Suit Without Central Government Consent.

The original plaintiff, S.K. Dhondy, proprietor of M/s. S.K. Dhondy & Co., owned a vessel m.v. "SKD-I" which was chartered to Dredging Corporation of ...