Search Results for "Section 164 statement"

1383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against Acquittal in Gold Smuggling Case — Retracted Confession and Lack of Independent Witnesses Lead to Acquittal Confirmation. Section 108 Customs Act statement retracted on ground of coercion and not corroborated by independent evidence, hence not reliable.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the acquittal of Narendra Ratanchand Jain (respondent no.1) for offences under the Customs A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Against Rape Conviction Based on Statement Under Section 164 CrPC Without Prosecutrix Testimony. The Appeal Questions the Reliance on Unproved FIR and Inadmissible Statement to Sustain Conviction Under Section 376 IPC.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard a criminal appeal filed by Sajji Kumar against his conviction for rape under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for a Residential Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

The provided judgment text is an incomplete excerpt containing only the listing of multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985

The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...