Search Results for "Sale agreement"

5250 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5250 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Limitation and Unenforceable Agreement. Agreement for Sale of compensation pool property held to be contingent on uncertain event of conveyance deed issuance, and suit filed beyond reasonable time barred by limitation.

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 19/01/2010 for a compensation pool property in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Execution of Arbitration Award as Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale. Arbitration Award Only Fixed Land Price; Executing Court Could Not Direct Sale Deed Execution Beyond Award's Scope.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Firm Rajasthan Udyog and its partners against Hindustan Engineering & Industries Ltd. The dispute origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Not Proved. Plaintiffs failed to establish execution of agreement to sell dated 06.02.2009 due to lack of independent witnesses and suspicious circumstances.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a regular first appeal against the judgment and decree dated 29.01.2013 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order on Sale of Secured Asset under SARFAESI Act. The Court Examines Whether Sale on 'As Is Where Is' Basis Was Validly Confirmed and Whether DRAT Erred in Setting It Aside.

The matter arises from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, Asset Rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Subsequent Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale Held Sham and Not Intended to Be Acted Upon. Evidence Act Sections 91 and 92 Do Not Bar Proof of Sham Transaction; Subsequent Purchasers Are Bona Fide Purchasers Without Notice.

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 7th December 1981 executed by the first defendant in favour of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals in Specific Performance and Permanent Injunction. Trial Court Dismissed Specific Performance Suit and Decreed Injunction; Plaintiff's Claim of Agreement to Sell and Possession Not Accepted, Subsequent Purchaser's Possession Protected.

The Regular First Appeals arose from a common judgment dated 13.09.2005 by the I Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in two suits: O....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Plaintiff Prefers First Appeal Against Trial Court’s Partial Decree in Specific Performance Suit. Trial Court Had Denied Specific Performance Due to Public Policy and Fabricated Receipts, Granting Only Refund of Admitted Advance.

The dispute originated from a suit for specific performance of two sale agreements dated January 6, 2003, concerning 8 acres of land in Salem District...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Trial Court Decree for Execution of Sale Deed. Agreement of Sale Dated 02.08.2007 Proved by Plaintiff; Defendants Failed to Discharge Burden of Proof Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants (defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 20.10.2012 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Channarayapatna, in O.S. No. 4/2008,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Alternative Decree for Damages. Plaintiff's claim for specific performance of flat agreement dismissed due to subsequent sale to bona fide purchaser; alternative decree for damages against original vendor confirmed.

The judgment arises from two appeals against a common decree dated 14.1.2010 passed by the Bombay High Court in Suit No.1642 of 1984. The original pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Money Recovery Instead of Specific Performance. The High Court erred in granting specific performance as the transaction was found to be a loan with collateral security under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the subsequent purchasers (appellants) against the High Court's decree granting specific performance of an agr...