Search Results for "Rule 46(2)"

186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Matrimonial Petition from Thane to Nagpur on Grounds of Wife's Convenience. Wife's Convenience Paramount in Matrimonial Transfer Under Section 24 CPC; Nagpur Bench Has Jurisdiction Over Entire State.

The applicant wife, Mrs. Sayali Kuber, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Hindu M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to State Commission's Order Setting Aside Attachment in Consumer Dispute. Earlier writ petition challenging same order dismissed for non-prosecution; no fresh cause of action shown.

The petitioner, R.B. Upadhyay, filed a consumer complaint against Vodafone Essar Ltd. (respondent No.2) for deficiency of service on 20 March 2008, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Lease Dispute — Petitioner Seeks to Bring Subsequent Events on Record. Amendment Sought to Include Facts Regarding Dispossession After Filing of Suit, Held That Amendment Should Be Allowed as It Does Not Change Nature of Suit.

The petitioner, Mohan s/o Maluram Agrawal, filed a suit for mandatory injunction against the respondents, Smt. Kaladevi wd/o Sawarmal Agrawal and Pras...