Search Results for "Rule 14A"

134 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 134 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail in SC/ST Act Case Due to Prima Facie False Implication and Lack of Public View Element. Caste-based insult allegations under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 fail as incident occurred in private setting, not in public view.

The appellant, Sagar @ Nikhil Jagdish Kate, filed an appeal under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrociti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Evasion Case — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Settlement Application Without Considering Merits and Without Granting Personal Hearing Set Aside.

The petitioners, Dinesh Bhabootmal Salecha and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Settlemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CERA Audit Notice for Lack of Statutory Basis. Audit of Private Company's Records for Pre-GST and GST Periods Without Invoking Specific Statutory Provision Held Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Kiran Gems Private Limited, a private limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Order in Tax Assessment Writ Petition Due to Statutory Remedy Foreclosure. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Writ Petition After Statutory Appeal Was Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

The dispute arose from a tax assessment order dated 21.6.2017 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes against the respondent, a regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — No Fraud or Collusion Found in Consent Terms Filed by Counsel. Consent decree upheld as valid and binding under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The petitioners, Dhanaji Kashinath Shendkar and others, filed writ petitions challenging a consent decree passed in a suit for specific performance. T...