Search Results for "Recovery Panchanama"

1666 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1666 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eye Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as evidence lacked corroboration and credibility.

The case arises from the murder of Damu, a history sheeter and country liquor maker, on 10th August 2002 at 7:30 a.m. in village Virsi. The prosecutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Related Offences Arising from Group Clash Over Demolition of Boundary Wall. Court Frames Issues on Applicability of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC and Non-Explanation of Injuries to Accused.

The matter arose from two criminal appeals against the judgment of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, dated 3 October 2003, convicting the ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Decides Appeals of Six Convicted Accused in Murder Conspiracy Case Under Sections 302, 120-B IPC and Arms Act. Accused, Convicted for Hiring Killers to Murder Political Rival, Challenge Trial Court's Reliance on Eye Witnesses and Circumstantial Evidence.

The case involves criminal appeals arising from Sessions Case No. 44/2011 decided by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar. The appellants, origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 364, and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Varsha Bhimrao Rasal, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Karad, in Sessions Case No.8 of 2004 for the offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Doubtful Trap — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 not proved; complainant turned hostile; trap witness not independent.

The appellant, Manohar Bodade, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case No. 01/1993 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence of Gang Leader in MCOCA Kidnapping and Murder Case. Conviction under MCOCA and IPC for kidnapping for ransom and murder upheld, but co-accused's death sentence commuted to life imprisonment due to lesser role.

The judgment arises from a confirmation case and appeals against the conviction and death sentence of five accused persons under the Maharashtra Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act for LSD Possession — Compliance with Sections 50 and 52-A Established. Court finds no tampering with contraband and affirms ten-year rigorous imprisonment for possession of commercial quantity of LSD.

The appellant, Subodh Levi, was convicted by the Special Court under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS A...