Search Results for "Rebuttable presumption"

293 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 293 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Complainant's Loan of Rs.2,50,000 for Education and Family Necessities Supported by Evidence; Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused.

The complainant, Smt H B Bhagyalakshmi, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Srinidhi Finance & Investment Corporation, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Basavanthappa, for the offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The petitioners, accused Nos.1 and 2, were convicted by the LVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall unit, Bengaluru in C.C.No.53439/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act cannot be sustained when primary evidence of demand is absent due to complainant's death and no other reliable evidence establishes demand.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Mrs. Neeraj Dutta, an LDC in Delhi Vidyut Board, who was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Company and Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 r/w 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Directors' Claim of Not Being In Charge of Business at Time of Cheque Issuance Fails to Rebut Presumption of Liability Under Section 141.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s. Jaimin Jewelery Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Accused No.1) and its directors, Gautam Mehta (Accu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Defence of Blank Cheque Given as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (complainant) against the petitioner (accused) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Blank Cheque Defence Rejected as Unsubstantiated. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands in favour of holder, and accused failed to rebut it by preponderance of probabilities.

The appellant, The Bagayatdar Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 agai...