CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4905 OF 2022
1 Jan 1970The present civil appeal arose under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 challenging the order dated 19.04.2022 passed...
Search Results for "Public Interest Directors"
1247 result(s) found
Found 1247 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Winding Up of Mutual Fund Schemes and Interprets SEBI Regulations. The Court examined the interrelation and constitutional validity of Regulations 39 to 42 with Regulation 18(15)(c) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, while deferring final adjudication pending statutory proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992.
14 Jul 2021The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals concerning the interpretation and application of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual...
- 361
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes Pending Applications and Show Cause Notices in Scheme of Compromise Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956. Criminal Proceedings Under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 Allowed to Continue Notwithstanding Sanction of Scheme.
7 Jan 2010The matter arose from a scheme of compromise and arrangement proposed by Europlast India Ltd. under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The unsecu...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses SEBI's Appeal in Securities Market Violation Case Due to Absence of Question of Law. Tribunal's Factual Findings on Advertisements, Manipulation, and Natural Justice Upheld, with Jurisdiction Under Section 15Z of SEBI Act, 1992 Confined to Legal Issues.
25 Mar 2022The dispute arose from a statutory appeal under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, filed by SEBI against the Securit...
- 364
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Erstwhile Directors in First Insolvency Case, Holding IBC Overrides State Moratorium. Corporate Debtor's Belated Defence of Non-Disbursal Under Master Restructuring Agreement Rejected as After-Thought.
1 Aug 2026The case arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant, a multi-product company, faced ...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SEBI's Ex-Parte Interim Order in Securities Market Manipulation Case. Court upholds SEBI's power to issue ex-parte interim directions under Section 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 to protect market integrity.
15 May 2025The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Hemant Kulshrestha and Vinay Bansal challenging an ex-parte interim order passed by the Se...
- 206
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court's Lack of Jurisdiction in Company Dispute — Section 430 of Companies Act, 2013 Does Not Bar Civil Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Sale of Company Property Without Board Resolution. The court held that the NCLT does not have the power to declare a sale deed void or grant permanent injunction, and thus the civil court retains jurisdiction.
26 Oct 2020The petitioner, Shankar Assana Gaddam, claiming to be a director of Achanak Associates Realtors Pvt. Ltd., filed a civil suit challenging a board reso...
- 138
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Rejection of Discharge in MPID Act Case – Alleged Fraudulent Hosiery Scheme – No Discharge as Prima Facie Case Exists
2 May 2025The appellant, Smt. Neelam Rajendra Nanaware, filed a criminal appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Fin...
- 153
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Share Dispute Due to Limitation and Lack of Urgency. Plaintiff's claim for declaration of share ownership and rectification of register barred by limitation under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 as cause of action arose in 1998 but suit filed in 2008.
16 Mar 2017The plaintiff, Messer Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in British Virgin Islands, filed a suit in 2008 seeking a declaration that it is the ow...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Law Dispute Over Share Transfer Rectification — Transfer of Shares Held Void for Non-Compliance with Articles of Association. The court held that the Company Law Board failed to consider the mandatory requirement of pre-emptive rights under the Articles, and the transfer was invalid as it violated the company's own regulations.
7 Jul 2010The case involves an appeal under Section 10(F) of the Companies Act, 1956 against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 22.06.2009. The appel...
- 74
