Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Selvaraj Johnson Rodrigo, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to a corruption trap laid by the Anti Corruption Bureau, Beed, against Rajendra Dhondiba Jogdand (accused no.1), an Agricultural Off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Madhav Bhalchandra Rajurkar, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for demanding and accepti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gorakh Pandurang Jedhe, a clerk in the Irrigation Department, who was charged under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses CBI Petition Challenging Sanction for Prosecution in Corruption Case. Sanction order held valid despite not mentioning specific sections of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as material placed before authority indicated offences.

The petitioner, the Superintendent of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation (ACB), Pune, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Manik Dajibaji Bhatkar (accused no.1) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Vikram s/o Jija Gite, a Talathi (village revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge (Anti Corruption), Aurangabad on 22.8.200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Recalls Order in CBI Revision Application Due to Non-Compliance with Natural Justice - Applicant Not Heard Before Adverse Order. The court held that an order passed without hearing a necessary party violates natural justice and must be recalled under Section 362 Cr.P.C.

The applicant, Mr. Ashok Chavan, was an accused in Special Case No. 42 of 2012 pending before a Special Judge, facing trial for offences under Section...