Search Results for "Pharmaceutical Trademark"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Pharmaceutical Trademark"

76 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sales Tax Reference on Levy of Purchase Tax on Inter-State Purchases of Raw Materials Used in Manufacture of Exported Goods. The court framed a question of law regarding the applicability of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 to inter-State purchases of raw materials used in exports.

21 Nov 2025

The applicant, M/s. Duphar Interfran Ltd., is a company engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products. It purchased raw materials from outside...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — No Material Suppression Found. The court upheld the order granting injunction and appointing Court Receiver, noting that the defendants' subsequent registration does not bar the plaintiff's claim and that the order was time-limited with liberty to apply for variation.

7 Oct 2022

The case involves a commercial appeal by the original defendants against an ex-parte ad-interim order dated 15th September 2022 passed by a single jud...

High Court

Bombay High Court Continues Ex-Parte Injunction in Copyright and Trademark Infringement Suit Over ATYATI Device Mark. The Court found no suppression by the Plaintiff and held that the Defendants' adoption of a deceptively similar logo without explanation warranted continuation of the injunction.

30 Apr 2024

The present suit was filed by the Plaintiff, a company engaged in IT solutions, alleging infringement of its copyright in the ATYATI device mark, infr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Coconut Oil Classification Dispute — Holds Pure Coconut Oil in Small Packings Classifiable as Hair Oil Under Heading 3305. The Court applied Section Note 2 and Chapter Note 3 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, ruling that packaging for retail sale as hair oil overrides classification as edible oil under Heading 1513.

13 Dec 2024

The case involved appeals by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against M/s. Madhan Agro Industries (India) Private Ltd. concerning the clas...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)