Search Results for "PW1"

2653 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2653 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Rajendra Dadaji Supare, a Police Head Constable, who was charged under Sections 7, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by other witnesses.

The appellants, Jagannath Shidya Patil, Umesh Jagannath Patil, and Kisan Jagannath Patil, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahada in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony. Prosecution Failed to Prove Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC for Offences Under Sections 302, 323, 341 IPC.

The defacto complainant, father of the deceased Gopinath, filed this criminal appeal under Section 372 CrPC against the judgment of acquittal dated 06...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Criminal Appeal No. 798 of 2018 Filed by Convict. Bench Reserves Judgment on 26 March 2025 and Pronounces on 7 April 2025.

The present proceedings pertain to Criminal Appeal No. 798 of 2018 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in its Criminal Appellate Jurisdictio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Contends Non-Proof of Bribe Demand and Admission of Loan Repayment by Complainant.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 29.03.2005 in Special Case No.26/2003 passed by the Special Judge at Aurangabad, convicting the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramesh Jayashram Pardeshi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Eye-Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence. The court found that the testimony of eye-witnesses was consistent and corroborated by medical evidence and recovery of the weapon, leading to dismissal of the appeal.

The appellant, Pradeep @ Balu Shivram Barge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the murder of Dilip Jadhav under Section 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Child Witness Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Section 376 IPC and Sections 4, 8 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Balaji Sarjerao Kamble, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for the rape of a 7-year-old girl under Section 376 of the Indian Pen...