Search Results for "POCSO convict"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 363 IPC set aside as the dying declarations were contradictory and lacked corroboration.

The appellant, M. Vigneshwaran, was convicted by the Special Court under POCSO Act for penetrative sexual assault and kidnapping of a 17-year-old girl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping in POCSO Case — Acquittal on Sexual Offences Stands. Appellant convicted under Section 363 IPC for taking a minor without consent, but acquitted of rape and sexual assault due to lack of credible evidence.

The appellant, Issub Khan, was convicted by the Fast Track Court (POCSO) at Panaji for the offence of kidnapping under Section 363 of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in POCSO Case — Upholds Conviction for Rape of Five-Year-Old Based on DNA Evidence. Semen on Victim's Clothes Matched Accused's DNA, Corroborating Victim's Account Despite Absence of Physical Injuries.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of the accused for the rape of a five-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i)(j) IPC and Section 5(m)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Minority and Non-Consensual Nature of Relationship.

The appellant, Pravin Popat Kharat, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC and Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support penetration.

The appellant, Siddharth @ Bollywood S/o Bapurao Meshram, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 376(2)(i) and Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of POCSO and IPC Proceedings on Compromise Between Accused and Complainant Who Later Married. Marriage Between Accused and Complainant Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Section 482 CrPC as Continuation Would Be Abuse of Process.

The applicants, Taj @ Arjun S/o. Ajay Mishra (accused) and Ragini Ashok Amarnani (complainant), jointly filed a criminal application under Section 482...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Brutal Rape and Murder of Two-Year-Old Child. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Testimony Confirm Guilt Under Sections 302, 363, 376, 377 IPC.

The case involves the brutal kidnapping, rape, unnatural offence, and murder of a two-year-old girl by the appellant, Ravi S/o Ashok Ghumare, in Jalna...