Search Results for "Ostensible owner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Ostensible owner"

122 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 122 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A MV Act — Insurer Liable Despite Alleged Licence Violation. Claim under Section 163-A is no-fault liability; insurer cannot avoid payment on ground of driver lacking licence.

29 Jan 2014

The case arises from a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 filed by the legal representatives of Babasaheb Wankhede, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Application for Judgment on Admissions in Admiralty Suit. Plaintiff Seeks Relief Under Order XII Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Alleging Admissions by Defendants.

4 Apr 2025

The present matter concerns an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Raj Transport and Trading Company, in the pending Admiralty Suit No. 17 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Application to Sell Matrimonial Home and Directs Husband to Pay EMIs in Family Court Dispute. The court held that the husband is liable to pay EMIs as maintenance and the wife may sell the property with court supervision to protect the matrimonial home from bank action under the Securitisation Act.

20 Mar 2013

The writ petition arose from an order of the Family Court No.7, Mumbai dated 23rd August 2011, which rejected the wife's application for direction to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — State Not Liable for Delay in Obtaining Approvals. The court held that the State Government did not breach the Joint Venture Agreement by failing to obtain necessary approvals within a reasonable time, as the agreement did not impose an absolute obligation on the State.

11 May 2012

The appellant, Carol Info Services Limited, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the State of Maharashtra to establish a super specialty hospit...

High Court

High Court Grants Interim Relief to Advertisement Agency in Arbitration Dispute Over Hoarding Construction Agreement. The court found a prima facie case and balance of convenience in favor of the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Adtrack Media LLP, an advertisement agency, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reviews Maintainability of Claim Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in Cross Appeals Arising from Fatal Accident. Claim by Legal Heirs of Deceased Driver Who Borrowed Vehicle and Died Without Involvement of Another Vehicle Is Under Scrutiny.

28 Sep 2020

The judgment involves two appeals arising from the same motor accident dated 20.09.2006. An auto rickshaw driven by Ramesh Babu, in which Murali was a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

27 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Applicant Seeks to Add Averments Regarding Will and Tenancy Rights. Amendment Sought After Commencement of Trial but Before Completion of Evidence — Court Holds That Amendments Necessary for Determining Real Controversy May Be Allowed Even After Trial Has Commenced, Subject to No Prejudice to Opposite Party.

28 Jan 2026

The applicant, Ashok Gupta, filed an Interim Application (IA) in a pending suit seeking amendments to the plaint. The suit was filed for declaration a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Suit — Upholds Refusal to Strike Out Defence Under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC for Failure to File Written Statement Within 90 Days. The court held that the power to strike out defence is discretionary and not automatic, and that non-disclosure of defence under Order 6A Rule 3 CPC does not justify striking out.

21 Dec 2017

The present appeals arise from a suit filed in 1987 by Behram Nowrosji Gamadia and Jehangir Dhan Mistri (original plaintiffs) against several defendan...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)