Search Results for "Order XLIII CPC"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition for Lack of Standing as Non-Party. Order XLIII Rules 1 & 2 CPC bar review by a person who was not a party to the original writ petition.

The review petitioner, Sri. Venkateshwara Rao, filed a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC seeking review of a judgment dated 23.04.2019 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Pass Judgment on Admissions in Property Suit. Order XII Rule 6 CPC Judgment on Admissions Cannot Be Based on Disputed Facts Requiring Trial.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed against a common order dated 11.02.2014 passed by the XLIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Common Property. Suit for partition and separate possession fails as plaintiff failed to prove that suit schedule properties were joint family properties.

The appellant, Domegunta Venkatasesha Reddy, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Review Order in Partition Suit — Amendment of Plaint Allowed at Appellate Stage. Order XLIII Rule 1(w) CPC — Review Court erred in setting aside amendment granted by appellate court under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The present appeal arises from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiff (respondent No.1) seeking partition and separate possession of joint f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Judgment for Lack of Reasons in Declaration and Injunction Suit — Remands for Fresh Disposal. Court finds that the Trial Court failed to discuss evidence or assign reasons on issues framed, rendering the judgment unsustainable under Order 20 Rule 4(2) CPC.

The appellant, who was the defendant in the original suit, challenged the judgment and decree dated 23 June 2014 passed by the XLIII Additional City C...