Search Results for "No-confidence motion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "No-confidence motion"

103 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice Issued Without Prior Resolution of No-Confidence Motion by Gram Panchayat is Illegal and Arbitrary.

21 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Chethana A Channabasappa, the President of Hosahalli Gram Panchayat, challenged a notice dated 06.01.2025 issued by the Assistant Comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging Removal by No-Confidence Motion. Court holds that removal of a directly elected Sarpanch must be by Gram Sabha under Section 35(1)(b) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and not by Gram Panchayat members under Section 55(2).

10 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Jijabai Parasram Aatram, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dhamandari, a seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe Woman. On ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion by Gram Sabha Invalid Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Directly Elected Sarpanch Under Section 30A-1A Cannot Be Removed by Gram Sabha; Only Voters Who Elected Him Can Pass No-Confidence Motion.

12 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Amol Pandurang Godbole, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Balirampur in the 2017 general election, a post reserved...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Trust Office Bearers. Scheme of Administration Does Not Prohibit No-Confidence Motion; Resolution Valid Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

3 Nov 2020

The petitioners, Lakhichand Marotrao Dhoble and Kisangopal Chunnilalji Gandhi, were the Chairman and Treasurer respectively of a public trust named Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Chairman and Deputy Chairman of Panchayat Samiti for Violation of Mandatory Notice Period Under Section 66(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The court held that the 15-day notice requirement is mandatory and non-compliance invalidates the resolution.

25 Sep 2020

The petitioners, who were the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of Panchayat Samiti Nagbhid, challenged a no-confidence motion passed against them in a spe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Notices Against Gram Panchayat Members Due to Lack of Service and Forged Signatures. Notices Issued Under Section 49 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Procedural Requirements.

15 Jul 2014

The petitioners, four members of the Gram Panchayat of Sirawara village, Manvi Taluk, Raichur District, challenged the action of the respondent author...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice for Special Meeting to Consider No-Confidence Motion Against Taluka Panchayat President — Notice Issued by Executive Officer Without Authority Under Section 3(3) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that only the Prescribed Authority under Section 3(3) of the Act can convene a special meeting for a no-confidence motion, and the Executive Officer's notice was without jurisdiction and void ab initio.

6 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Sri B.V. Krishnareddy, was the President of the Taluka Panchayat, Srinivaspura Taluk, Kolar District. The respondents 3 to 11, who wer...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Panchayat Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha for Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 — Notice Issued Without Seven Days' Clear Notice Period and Without Specifying Date of Meeting.

3 Feb 2014

The petitioners, Smt. Chandrakala and Smt. Bhagyamma, were the Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha respectively of Makali Grama Panchayat in Ramanagara District...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Adhyaksha for Violation of Mandatory Debate Requirement. Failure to Allow Debate Under Rule 3(3) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayat) Rules, 1994 Renders Motion Invalid.

31 Jan 2014

The petitioner, H.N. Nagaveni, was elected as Adhyaksha (President) of Palagatti Grama Panchayat on 17.12.2012. On 21.12.2013, 15 members of the Panch...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Representation to Adjourn No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President — Petitioners Who Signed Notice Cannot Withdraw Support Without Proper Procedure

20 Jan 2014

The petitioners, Sri T. Rajakumar Naik and Smt. Gangamma, were elected members of Kanchipura Gram Panchayat in May 2010. On 30.12.2013, 14 members, in...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)