INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5184 OF 2026
31 Jul 2026The matter arose from interim applications filed by The City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (CIDCO) seeking impleadment...
Search Results for "New Town Development Authority"
899 result(s) found
Found 899 result(s)
High Court
- 63
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).
30 Jul 2024The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...
- 441
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court in Town Planning Compensation Case — Corporation's Failure to Deliver Allotted Land Amounts to Breach of Statutory Duty Under Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976. The Court held that the plaintiffs were entitled to compensation for the shortfall in land area due to the Corporation's failure to perform its statutory obligations under Sections 65, 68, 84, and 85 of the Act.
10 May 2024The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court which allowed the appeal of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and dismissed the c...
- 415
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Ulhasnagar Development Plan, Upholds Statutory Process. Court holds that objections to draft development plan must be raised before the planning authority under MRTP Act, and belated challenges after final notification are not maintainable.
19 Dec 2023The judgment concerns two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the development plan for Ulhasnagar city. ...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Directing Shift of Toll Plaza for Violation of National Highways Fee Rules. Construction at 194 km of NH30 Found to Violate Rule 8 of National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 Due to Lack of Written Reasons and Failure to Meet Conditions for Municipal Area Placement.
23 Sep 2021The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by respondents 1 to 17 (writ petitioners) seeking to restrain the construction of a toll plaza at 194 km ...
- 305
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.
6 Feb 2020The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Seeks Resolution of Dispute Over Unauthorized Colony in Faridabad Through Arbitration and Committee Formation. The Court directs parties to submit responses on land extent, layout, and development charges to facilitate completion of the project.
3 Oct 2019The present dispute pertains to the claim of allottees who were not allotted plots on land owned by respondent No.6-Colonizer, Durga Builders Pvt. Ltd...
- 786
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Construction of Shopping Complex Within Prohibited Highway Area; Directions for Demolition Sought by Shirdi Councillors Based on Violation of Building Bye-Law and Lack of No-Objection Certificate.
20 Dec 2017The writ petition concerns a challenge to the construction of a shopping complex on land bearing survey no. 170/A2/1 abutting the Nagar-Manmad highway...
- 13
High Court
- 11
