Search Results for "Negotiable Instruments Act"

1230 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1230 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rejects Plaint in Money Recovery Suit - Applicant Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Succeeds -Plaintiff' Suit Barred by Maharashtra Money Lending Act Due to Unlicensed Lending

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard an interim application filed by the defendant under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice and Absence of Debt or Liability. Cheques Issued as Security for Future Transactions Do Not Attract Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioners, Parth Bhadresh Mehta, Hiten Kantilal Shah, and Vishal Laxmikant Thakkar, filed Criminal Writ Petitions under Section 482 of the Code ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Case for Non-Compliance with Section 202 CrPC Inquiry. Magistrate failed to conduct mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC before issuing process against accused residing outside jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Kunal Rajesh Kothari, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the order dated 19th January 2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Summary Suit — Defendant's Vague Defence of Security Cheques Not a Triable Issue. The court upheld the decree for Rs.61,00,000/- with interest under Order 37 CPC, as the defendant failed to disclose a plausible defence.

The respondent/plaintiff, Pravin Hiralal Shah, filed a summary suit against the appellant/defendant, Rajesh Laxmichand Udeshi @Bhatia, for recovery of...