Search Results for "Nandi"

82 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 82 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds rejection of claims for additional payment due to lack of evidence and failure to prove that extra work was ordered by the Railways.

The appellant, M/s. N.N. Constructions, a proprietary concern, filed a commercial appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money. Order 6 Rule 2(3) CPC does not require dates and sums in figures and words in plaint, and Order 37 Rule 2 CPC does not mandate separate verification.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants (original defendants) against the order dated 07/11/2022 passed by the 14th Joint C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petition Against CGRF Order in Electricity Connection Cost Refund Dispute. Distribution Licensee Not Obligated to Refund Infrastructure Costs for Dedicated Distribution Transformer Under Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), a Distribution Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003, filed thre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Order Upheld. Penalty under Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 set aside for lack of evidence of aiding and abetting.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...