Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act"

730 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 730 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Resolves Conflict on Cessation of APMC Membership Under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Members Elected by Managing Committees of Cooperative Societies or Village Panchayats Cease to Be APMC Members Upon Losing Membership in the Parent Body.

The case involves a reference to the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur to resolve conflicting Division Bench decisions on the interpretati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election Due to Absence of Notice. Court Holds That Presence and Participation of All Members Cures Any Defect in Notice Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who were members of Gram Panchayat Sukli, challenged the election of respondent no.6 as Up-Sarpanch. The election was held on 23.05.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Invalid Votes by Resigned Members. Resignation of Grampanchayat Members Takes Effect Immediately Under Section 35(3A) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, Rendering Their Participation in No-Confidence Motion Void.

The petitioner, Manjulabai Govind Dhumal, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kantekur, Taluka Omerga, District Osmanabad. The Grampanchayat consisted o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stay on Grampanchayat Elections Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Additional Collector's Order Staying Sarpanch/Up-Sarpanch Elections Set Aside as Unauthorized Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Parmeshwar Kachru Satpute and Dadasaheb Baburao Khindkar, were members of the Group Grampanchayat of Babhalwadi, Bedkuchiwadi, and Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gram Panchayat Members Challenging Complaint Against No-Confidence Motion. No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Upheld Despite Pending Appeal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, elected members of Gram Panchayat Mahadulla, moved a no-confidence motion against Sarpanch Smt. Nirmala Bonde on 5-8-2006, which was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...