Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act"

108 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination Papers for Municipal Council Elections. Candidates Failed to Produce Required Documents Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 and Rules Thereunder.

15 Nov 2022

The petitioners, ten individuals, filed nomination papers for election to the Municipal Council, Dharur, District Beed. The last date for filing nomin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of APMC Executive Committee for Violation of Natural Justice — Order Passed Without Show Cause Notice Under Section 77(5) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Invalid. The Court held that the power under Section 77(5) is quasi-judicial and requires compliance with principles of natural justice, including a show cause notice and opportunity of hearing.

24 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Santosh Tale, a member of the Executive Committee of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Khamgaon, challenged an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Voting Rights for APMC Representatives in Legislative Council Elections. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Not a Local Authority Under Article 171 of the Constitution of India.

2 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Radhakishan Deorao Pathade, Chairman of the Super Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Aurangabad, filed a writ petition seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recount Order in APMC Election. Commissioner's order for rescrutiny and recount of all ballot papers set aside as there was no material irregularity in counting.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Milind Shreeram Tayade, was elected as a member of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), Amravati, from a seat reserved...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Examines Legality of Pension Recovery Conditions Imposed Post-Facto for APMC Employment. Petition Challenges Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal’s Finding that Reemployment Constituted Commercial Employment under Rule 163(8) of Pension Rules.

20 Jul 2017

The petitioner retired from the Maharashtra State Government service on 31.05.1992 and immediately joined as Secretary of the Agriculture Produce Mark...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Extension of Term of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Members — State Government Exceeded Power Under Section 14(5) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 by Extending Term Without Justifiable Reasons and Without Considering Objections of Voters.

8 Dec 2016

The petitioners, voters of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Tal. Shirur, Dist. Pune, challenged the order dated 1st August 2016 passed by th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election Process of Agricultural Produce Market Committee — No Interference in Ongoing Election Under Article 226 of Constitution of India. Court Held That Once Election Process Commences, Writ Jurisdiction Should Not Be Exercised and Alternative Remedy of Election Petition Is Available.

8 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Mr. Nandkumar Anandrao Walanju, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the election process ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Validity of Customs Circular Mandating BIS Certification for Alloy Steel Deformed Bars. The Circular is Challenged as Ultra Vires the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 and Violative of Fundamental Rights.

24 Dec 2014

The four writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed by importers of alloy steel deformed bars/reinforcement bars challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Chairman of APMC Katol for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Notice Issued on 02.12.2013 for Meeting on 12.12.2013 Held Invalid as It Did Not Provide 15 Clear Days' Notice as Required by Rule 14(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Katol, challenged a notice dated 02.12.2013 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Administrator for APMC Ghatanji Due to Expiry of Managing Committee's Term. Postponement of Elections Does Not Imply Extension of Tenure Under Section 15A of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

17 Jun 2011

The petitioners, seven individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)