Search Results for "MHADA land"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "MHADA land"

280 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Protection of Stall in Slum Area — Petitioner Failed to Establish Possession Prior to Cut-off Date of 1.1.1995. Land Belonging to MHADA Vests in Slum Rehabilitation Authority Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

20 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Shriniwas Krishna Suvarna, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking protection for his stall located on land belongi...

High Court

Legal Dispute Over Termination of Developer's Appointment for SRS Implementation in Mumbai. Unraveling the Complexities of Land Allocation and Timely Implementation in Slum Rehabilitation Schemes in Maharashtra

10 May 2024

Legal dispute regarding the termination of a developer's appointment for implementing a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS) in Mumbai under the Maharasht...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Under Urban Land Ceiling Act — Land Not Acquired Due to Non-Compliance with Section 10(3) and Section 11(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The court held that mere notification does not vest land in the State without actual possession, and exemption applications under Sections 20 and 21 must be considered before declaring land surplus.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Bhagwant Dharmaraj Radke and Omprakash @ Dipchand Durgaprasad Agrawal against the State of Mahara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition in IOD Requiring Registered Agreement with Tenant for Redevelopment. Condition No.10 in IOD directing that registered agreement with existing tenant not be submitted before CC is set aside as arbitrary and contrary to DCR.

5 Jun 2018

The Petitioner, MIG (Bandra) Realtors and Builders Pvt. Ltd., a developer, acquired redevelopment rights over land admeasuring approximately 20149.40 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Railway's Refusal to Grant NOC for Redevelopment of Cooperative Housing Society. Held that Railway land vests in the President of India and the Railway has no authority to demand NOC for redevelopment on land owned by MHADA.

3 Dec 2020

The petitioners, Vinobha Bhave Nagar Godavari Adhyapak Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and M/s. Nisar Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Petition Challenging Construction of Residential Building and Public Parking Lot under DCR and MRTP Act — Court Examines Legality of Approvals and Concessions Granted by Municipal Commissioner. The Court Considers Whether Circular Restricting Public Parking Lots to Four Floors Overrides Provisions of DCR 33(24) and Implications of Notices under Sections 51 and 53(1) of MRTP Act.

13 May 2013

The Public Interest Litigation petition filed in 2012 before the Bombay High Court challenged the legality of approvals and construction of a 56‑sto...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in Land Dispute Under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 -- Petitioners Challenge Unilateral Grant to Magnum Tower CHS Limited

24 Feb 2026

The High Court of Bombay allowed a Writ Petition filed by Petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and others, challenging an order dated 9 Januar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under MHADA Act — Petitioner's Construction Found Legal and Permissible. The Court held that the Competent Authority and Appellate Authority erred in ordering eviction without considering that the petitioner had constructed the plot with due permission and that the respondent failed to prove unauthorized occupation.

10 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Vachalabai Haribhau Lingayat, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, Aurangaba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

20 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)