Search Results for "Lapsed proposal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Lapsed proposal"

146 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 146 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Plot Lease Forfeiture Case, Upholding UPSIDA's Cancellation Order. The forfeiture was justified due to breach of construction timelines under the lease agreement, and the High Court's refusal to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was correct as the dispute was contractual in nature.

6 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a dispute over the forfeiture of an industrial plot lease by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA). ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under MRTP Act — Purchase Notice Period Governed by Amended Section 127(1) as on Date of Notice, Not Date of Reservation Notification. The court held that the amended period of 24 months applies to a purchase notice issued after the amendment, and the petition was premature.

5 Mar 2025

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.34/3/5/2 at Village Ambegaon, Budruk, Pune, sought a declaration that the reservation of their land ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Land Acquisition by BDA Due to Lapse of Proceedings — Acquisition Initiated in 1993 Deemed Lapsed as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

29 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Sri B S Sudhakar Shetty, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Government Order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Structure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Held That Demolition Without Prior Notice Under Section 53(1) Is Illegal. The Court directed restoration of the demolished structure and compensation for loss caused by the illegal demolition.

21 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Anil Banarasidas Jindal (since deceased, through legal heirs) and Narayan Appasaheb Chalge, filed a writ petition challenging the dem...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Canal Construction Due to Lapse Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Make Award Within Two Years from Section 6 Declaration Renders Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed.

16 Nov 2016

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Bolegaon and Hirerogi villages, Indi Taluka, Vijayapura District, challenged the land acquisition pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Appointment for Live Stock Supervisor Post. Petitioner's Diploma in Dairy Development Management and Animal Husbandry Held Equivalent to Diploma in Animal Husbandry Under Recruitment Rules.

24 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Umesh Mohan Kumawat, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a communication dated 17.03.2015 issued by respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Declaring Lapsing of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition. Purchase notice under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 triggers automatic lapsing of reservation after 10 years from development plan commencement.

13 Aug 2015

The petitioners, owners of survey No. 661/A and 661/B within Ichalkaranji Municipal Council, challenged the continued reservation of their lands under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

29 Jan 2014

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Construction Approval Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi as they were not owners of the suit property and approached the court after substantial delay.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a writ petition filed by legal heirs of the original petitioner, Mr. Limo Cortez, challenging the construction approval granted by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Construction Approval Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi as they were not owners of the property and approached the court after substantial delay.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original petitioner Limo Cortez, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)