Search Results for "Intimidation"

780 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 780 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Caste-Based Intent. Property Dispute Leading to Assault and Abuse Does Not Attract Atrocities Act Without Specific Intent to Insult on Caste Grounds.

The appellants, Vinod Thakare, Varsha Thakare, and Aakash Thakare, filed an appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Quashing Petition in Extortion Case — MCOCA Approval Set Aside for Lack of Application of Mind. FIR under Section 387 IPC Upheld as Prima Facie Case Exists, but Sanction Under Section 23(1) MCOCA Quashed as Mechanical and Without Proper Satisfaction.

The Applicant, Hemant Dhirajlal Banker, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.303/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MCOCA Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Absence of Organized Crime Syndicate. Appellant discharged as prosecution failed to establish existence of a continuing unlawful activity and prior sanction under Section 23(2) of MCOC Act, 1999 was not obtained.

The appellant, Prem Chunnilal Yadav, filed a criminal appeal under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Act) chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Abetment to Suicide Case — No Proximate Link Between Alleged Acts and Suicide. FIR under Sections 306, 506 IPC Quashed as Allegations Did Not Disclose Instigation or Active Abetment by Applicant.

The applicant, Hafizur Rahman Sheikh, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Teacher in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Shriram Gondchar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur, in Sessions Case No.119/2006 for offences under ...